Like every year, an academic workshop has been organized in the English department in which students mistakes are analyze by research scholar and teachers, all the analyzing papers are shown in this workshop and suggestions given to students accordingly their Internal Exam and answering questions for the upcoming examinations.
Dr. Dilip Barad sir's introduction on "Academic writing workshop" it was started. Then the stage was taken over by "Clement Ndoricimpa Sir" who by demonstrating on his PowerPoint presentation made us understand about how we should be accurate of sentence structure, its grammar, spelling mistakes, presenting style of presentation objective style of writing and proper use of linguistic markers, its complete sense as it shouldn't be in fragment, which seems to make an incomplete sense else not any sense. He also introduced us with "scholarly citation ideas"
Some of the papers of our seniors altogether with few students from our side was also demonstrated by Heena ma'am and she also poured light on the same technical mistakes of language, technical mistakes of students correct use of capitalisation, and how logical arguments are required to catch a good marks it also shows your analytical power and critical arguments in answer paper.
Then a Researcher Vaidehi ma'am talked about her b
Experience while doing "annual refresher course" on swayam platform, where she gave a glimpse of his experience and also drew our attention to our habitual manner of writings . The way students are doing silly mistakes.
In conclusive session Dr. Dilip Barad Sir talked about how we're making silly mistakes in in-scripting our answer papers of our internal test paper, where we can cent percent score the full marks
but due to our laziness or lack of concentration on one side, we're unable to. For which he introduced us with "an e-document": writing examination answers : which was saying about how we should priory prepare for our examination answers and what prior precautions can be measured and by projecting one of the writings by a writer(Virginia Grover Birkbeck{University of London}) which he instructed us to access through his blog on (digital e-portfolio) : Which was saying about "ccc(cut copy paste) aspect", of not to apply in our assignments / research writing / even in our exam's answer book. While we should refer to some of the scholarly writers and their ideas, and by pondering upon we should, with mixture of all those ideas, make a hypothesis(as casterian theory says : that one should by applying one idea, forget it and let a new idea to be generated or modified from himself / herself / others(public / people). For making answer very coherent and worth full some instructions are need to be followed , the correctness of language, productivity of content, answer organisation, handwriting, highlights, all should be taken as a very serious note in your answer paper.
.
At last I would like to thank sir that he keeps on organising such sessions to push his students forward in their academic career as well as in their lives challenges and on equal measure thanking "Clement Ndoricimpa sir" and our duo ma'ams for serving us with excellent and useful sessions.
The same day....
Paper presentation on "Bramhanical narratives" in socialogy seminar organize by the department of socialogy , maharajaKrishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University.
In this research paper I want to talk about the ancient tradition and narratives during Independence time, the very known Brahmanical narratives are as on talk when Dr babasaheb ambedkar creating Indian Constitution , Brahminical stories are widely spread. I'm talking about what way was the economy based on Brahmin literature and the position of the Brahmin in the society, the social order etc. was decided.
The Brahmin community is considered as one of the upper caste diseases of pre-society. Babasaheb Ambedkar has raised his voice in the justice done to women, along with others made to Dalit society, talking about the four characters of the Indian society.
Whenever you talk about brahminical narrative let me clear that idea is the word brahminical is not criticize or considering any particular caste or group of people, it criticize a mind set and prejudice among the praise of mindset, here I am going to differentiate that brahminical narratives are not criticize brahmins as a human identity. In this paper try to display the praise of mind set towards powerful identities and social norms prevailed in society.
This is the ovary of my paper which I was presented inspirational conference.
Thank you 😊
Thank you 😊
Click here to move forward with my continue blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment